Latest Homes can be seized for credit card debt News

(2009-09-09) Debt advice charities struggling

(2009-07-24) Bondholders agree to swap debt

(2009-06-24) The solution to a fate worse than debt

(2009-06-11) Deep in debt, the student class of 2009

(2009-05-22) Are homeowners at risk?

(2009-05-20) Pensioner debt soars

Homes can be seized for credit card debt

Indebted borrowers can be forced to sell their homes to repay credit card debt due to a little-known legal loophole - charging orders.

According to sources from within the debt advice industry, some borrowers with as little as £1,000 of credit card debt have been forced to sell their homes through charging orders.

This is despite recent moves by the Ministry of Justice to protect vulnerable borrowers in the wake of the credit crunch.



Charging orders were first introduced in 1980, but their use has dramatically increased in recent years: there has been a tenfold increase in since 2000 and a 100% increase over the past two years.

Creditors can force a borrower to sell their home to repay unsecured debts through a 'charging order', a process which has come to light after Yvette Cooper, chief secretary to the Treasury, called for more measures to help people in danger of losing their homes.

In response to this, the Ministry of Justice decided to shelve plans to strengthen the act underlying the orders, the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, in favour of banks.

Are you worried about the safety of your home after receiving a charging order? Read our step-by-step guide to charing orders to find out more...



Under the draconian revision, which has been given Royal Assent but will remain unenforced for the foreseeable future, banks would have had the right to force people to sell their homes without seeking a county court judgment.

Shockingly, they could even do this if these people were keeping up to date with their loan repayments after agreeing a repayment schedule through the county courts.

The move was aimed at preventing indebted people from securing low monthly repayments and a freeze on their loan interest, then voluntarily selling their home, saving money in loan interest in the process, according to the Ministry of Justice.

However, an obvious consequence of the revision is that people who are making an effort to stick to agreed repayments may be involuntarily turfed out on the street by lenders.

One way in which the revision could have benefited borrowers – by setting a minimum limit on the amount owed for which a house could be sold – has now also been put off indefinitely.

Therefore, debtors could theoretically be forced to sell their homes for only £1,000 of unpaid, unsecured credit card debt.



Despite this, people at risk may be able to escape the consequences of a charging order by following a step-by-step guide.

The revisions may have been delayed to protect borrowers in difficult times, but when This is Money put it to the Ministry of Justice that the Act seriously disadvantages borrowers nonetheless, a spokesperson said: 'Although the changes to the Act were put on hold to benefit debtors, there is a chance some debtors may have to sell their homes to repay smaller amounts of debts.'